WRITING CONCLUSIONS

 

 

For a long research paper, conclusions really count.

 

 

·       They sum up what you’ve covered in the paper—restating the major points, reviewing the major connections or points of comparison between your topics. 

 

·       They restate your thesis—but now in a much more final, definitive form than the tentative one that you proposed in your introduction.

 

e.g., in the intro:  Can it be demonstrated that proprietary technical schools are inferior to community colleges in their ability to provide successful, high quality training that leads to good jobs? (Introductions often provide their thesis in the form of a question.)

 

Or  This paper will examine the relative merits of proprietary technical schools and community colleges, focusing on their ability to transition their graduates into good jobs.

(Here, the thesis is in the form of a statement)

 

Vs.:   Technical schools cannot deliver the same level of high quality training as community colleges, and they rarely follow through on their promises of getting graduates the good jobs that will allow their students to pay off the large debt load that they’ve accumulated.

          (Here, the thesis comes in a clear and definitive final statement.)

 


 

BUT THAT’S NOT ALL THEY DO.

 

·       They can bring your paper full circle, returning to your opening anecdote, lead-in self-disclosure, or however else you opened the paper—and finish the story. (e.g., you can come back to your own story about why you decided to become a teacher, and now use the results of your research to reaffirm your commitment to take that path—to make a difference)

 

·       They can look to the future, speculate on alternative visions of how things could be.

 

·       They can extend your discussion from the immediate topic at hand to larger issues  (e.g., larger issues related to our society’s refusal to invest long-term in education; larger implications of our society’s refusal to ignore the nutritional needs of its children), taking it to a higher level, meditating on the ethical or deeper social issues involved.

 

·       They can apply the fruits of your research to other relevant areas (e.g., how the positive elements of home schooling or of charter schools can be applied to the mainstream school system, and how this could improve that system; or how the lessons learned from the failure of drug education could be applied to sex education or other similar curricula)

 

·       They can pose questions for the reader, returning the ball to the reader’s court—thought-provoking, difficult questions that must be pondered and meditated on, for which there are no easy answers.

 

·       They can provide a final quote that seems to embody what you have learned from your project, a quote that works to draw the various strands of your paper together.


The Normal Structure for a Conclusion

 

III.      Conclusion

 

     A.  Summary/Restatement of Thesis (i.e., the first set

                    of bullet points above)

 

          B.    Lead-Out (one or more of the second set of bullet

                         points)

 

As you can see, the Conclusion is thus a “mirror-image” of the Introduction—where you opened with a “lead-in,” then moved on to indicate the thesis and major topics to be covered.

 

Your opening thus draws the reader into your paper, and your closing leads them out.

 

 

RETURN to WR123 Page.