WR122           Winter 2006                                                   Michael Dembrow, Instructor

 

ESSAY 3: AN ARGUMENT ON ANOTHER HEALTHCARE-RELATED ISSUE

 

            Controversies, controversies—the world is so full of them!  Each one engenders a number of positions, a plurality of arguments to be considered and debated, analyzed and rebutted, as we try to decide where we stand, try to take positions as voters, as members of a community of thinkers and active citizens.  In your last paper, you all looked at one area of controversy: the question of how healthcare should be funded.  In this essay, I also want you to look at a healthcare problem.  Here, however, you are free to choose the specific topic of concern.  It should be a controversial one (i.e., an area over which intelligent people might disagree), and you should take a position on it.  It may be something that you touched on in your second essay, but now want to get into more deeply.

 

            There are many healthcare controversies swirling around us these days: 

 

 

For your final essay of the term, I’d like you to choose one of these topics or one of your own choosing, and do something similar to what you did for the second essay: read, research, and write an argument on it.  Your research and reading will allow you to do three things:  (a) gain a better understanding of this particular issue, (b) understand the different viewpoints of people writing or speaking on this subject, and (c) take a position yourself on this subject and argue it effectively.

 

            For research purposes, you can again restrict your searches to the internet.  You won’t have much time to do this research, since the draft is due next week.  Take advantage of the link to healthcare sources on our class website.  Use Ebscohost or one of the other databases accessible through the PCC library. 

 

            Altogether, I'd like you to locate and use at least 4 credible sources for this paper.  Again, I want you to select arguments, not news stories.  You should be surveying credible opinion pieces, position papers, editorials, that kind of thing.  At least one of your sources should again be an argumentative essay that you’ve obtained via Ebscohost.

 

              Again, be sure you record the internet addresses for the sources, and the dates on which you found them (it’s crucial for bibliographic purposes). 

 

 

 

            The paper itself should make use of each of these sources, with at least one quote and/or paraphrase from each.  But remember, this is not a report; it’s an argument.  You’re not just stringing together a series of summaries of sources.  Your goal is to make the reader interested, concerned, and intrigued by the controversy, and of course to move the reader to agree with you. 

           

            You might think about writing your very first draft of the paper without sources, in order to make your own argument, then go back and strengthen the argument by using the sources to amplify and support your statements.  However, the paper that you bring to the draft workshop should already have quotes and information from your sources, as well as a Works Cited page.

 

            Again, you will need to make it clear to the reader that you have considered, carefully considered, the arguments of the other side and acknowledge their good points.  None of the issues here will be a simple right/wrong subject; there will be merits to the arguments of both sides.   When you can accept parts of their argument, do so; that will make your argument more comprehensive and sophisticated, and will actually strengthen it.  Quote them when appropriate. 

 

            On the other hand, you do want to take a clear position on the issue.  The reader should have no trouble knowing exactly where you stand.  Make sure that every paragraph in the body opens with a good topic sentence that somehow relates to your main argument. 

 

            Don’t forget to include all three appeals in your argument: rational, ethical, and emotional If possible, include a brief human-interest example, ideally (but not necessarily) your own or that of someone you know.

 

            To help you formulate the arguments on both sides, I’d again like you to do a dialogue and hand it in with your draft.

 

            We’ll have a draft workshop on March 6, and I’m expecting completed drafts (with references and Works Cited) on that day, or else--absence no excuse!!!  I’ll get you some feedback by the end of the week (i.e. by Friday, March 10), and your final draft will be due a week later (i.e., by Friday, March 17).

                       

Typed draft due:  Monday, March 6

Typed final draft due:  Friday, March 17

Length:  4-5 typed pages

 

 

RETURN to WR122 Page.